Law guardians are lawyers and “officers of the court,” appointed by the court to represent the child interests
without being bound by the child expressed preferences. I guess this is where the line separating efficient and inefficient law guardians lies. Good law guardians look beyond “child expressed preferences,” which might not be his or her but those of an alienating custodial parent. My girls, Camille and Chloé, and myself got the bad type.
In September 2002, after the trial of child abuse initiated by my ex-wife had started, the law guardian Garline Octobre was unequivocal. According to her, my girls were not “comfortable “with unsupervised visitations, period. I argued that before the trial and the restraining order requested by sicko ex-wife, my girls were perfectly comfortable with unsupervised visitations. This discomfort was not the girls’, it was sicko’s. It was like talking to a wall. Verdict: relation in jail. Supervised visitations for an indefinite period of time, without any consideration for the harm it might cause to the relation between me and my children.
Garline Octobre’s monitoring over the first twenty- three supervised visitations ran by “Comprehensive Family Services” revealed totally inexistent. The relationship between a non-custodial father and his children was in the hands of a private business, and Octobre was nowhere to be found. I suppose her policy was the “let’s just pray for the best” type.
Garline October’s interest for the welfare of my children did not increase a bit when sicko-ex wife turned therapeutic supervised visitations into a fiasco, in the Spring of 2004. After five therapeutic supervised visitations, unsupervised visitations were next. Yet, the nocuous influence of the mother had to be kept in check, said the social worker Traci Shinabarger in a letter to law guardian Octobre. Garline Octobre’s reaction when Traci Shinabarger is taken off the case by Spitzer and the plan of resuming unsupervised visitations is off: resounding silence. Octobre did not step in; not a call, a reprimand to the mother, who was free to alienate at will.
In my case, and perhaps more generally for the sinking family court system, the law guardian is the weakest link: biased, unwilling to monitor the work of an incompetent agency and the influence of an alienating mother, and therefore detrimental to the children’s interests she was supposed to serve. The great State of New York should dispose of them or train them.
The Law Guardian in my case made my son’s counselor an expert witness. This witness told lie after lie, even about my 7 year old son. So I did some investigating after Court, this was 2 weeks ago. I discovered that my Law Guardian and this Counselor, who my ex’s attorneys forced Tyler to go see, have been friends on Facebook since 2009. Tell me I got a fair trial in Saratoga County Family Court. It was these lies told by this counselor that caused me to lose my kids. I now have them every other weekend. It was obvious to me at the time that this counselor was coached. She stated things on the stand, that I had previously said to the Law Guardian, not to her. The counselor stated, on the stand, that during one of my son’s sessions, I threatened vengeance on Family Court Officials if I lost this case. Are you kidding me? Never happened. This was a counselor that was on my ex’s witness list….you think I would be that dumb? My kids are being abused, the ex still gets CPS reports filed against her. They had nothing on me. Their whole petition was lies and they knew I could prove it. So they go and do this. If there is a higher place to go than Supreme Court, I want to know. This has been one of the hardest things to accept. Losing my kids based on lies. Why? This counselor made the mother out to be me, and me her. Everyone that’s seen my kids with me and with my ex….comments on how different they are when they are with me. Even the Law Guardian. The Law Guardian stated to my wife and I that when she visited my ex, the kids were running around swearing. My kids would never do that in front of me. The counselor on the other hand, said my son Tyler was….during a session. Bull!! You can’t find a person in the world that has ever seen my son swear in front of me. It took all I had to not react to these punishing lies….I lost my kids because of them……and they say I’m too angry. Go figure.
I BELIEVE THIS IS AN ABUSE OF POWER AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE TO THE CHILD.. I SEE THIS IN NYS ALOT THEN AFTER FLEECING THE FATHER THE DELIQUENT MOMS ARE ALLOWED TO GET OUT OF JAIL OR REHAB AND PROCEES TO PICK UP WHERE THEY LEFT OFF.